🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to employ a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, handed down on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to lift a district court's ruling that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its ruling.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the new maps. It had instructed the state to revert to the districts created after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Strong Opposition

Through a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's action. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, pointing out that its ruling was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Battle

This decision is part of a countrywide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican control. Typically, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that might create a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have countered with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party representatives criticized the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party election organization.

Another senior Democratic leader argued the court had yet again eroded its credibility by upholding a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.