🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.